Lens Pier Design Changes Again
An updated design includes more shade structures, restaurant spaces and wider walkways. New renderings were also released.
A new set of renderings of the "Lens," the proposed structue for replacing the city pier, already is drawing controvery from opponents on the City Council.
Architect Michael Maltzan showed the City Council on Tuesday some additional changes he made to the design, including more shade structures, spaces for restaurants and wider walkways.
Maltzan said that like the Eiffel Tower in Paris, the Lens will provide a "literal" view of the city but will also enable the public to envision what St. Petersburg may be like in the future.
“That’s what I believe is fundamental when we talk about it as an icon,” Maltzan said. “It’s a place to come and connect to the extraordinary landscape of the bay. Also, a place to see the city now and to see the city as it will (continue) to evolve in the future.”
Council Concerns
But concerns by two council members raised Tuesday were grounded in the economic realities of 2012. Wengay Newton and Karl Nurse questioned whether the new renderings accurately depict the $50 million proposed structure.
Both already voted in the minority for allowing a citywide referendum on the future of the pier, which the council defeated.
On Tuesday Nurse said it is dishonest for the Maltzan team to show renderings (pictured above) of completed restaurants and activities that do not fit into the $50 million budget for building the pier. He noted that the images shown would entail additional spending.
“I voted for this a couple times along the road,” Nurse said. “Council, I thought, was really remarkably clear that $50 million is what was available, and you can see that the design has been downsized by about 20 percent to get within the budget.”
Nurse said the restaurants on the proposed Lens are just shells with plumbing and electrical hookups. He said what the public actually gets for $50 million are sidewalks, restrooms, drinking fountains, shade structures and seating.
“It’s not much for $50 million bucks,” Nurse said.
He said the Maltzan team is assuming a restaurateur will come in and build a restaurant on the Lens or at the Hub. The Hub is a structure that is part of the "Lens" design near the entrace of the pier just south of second street.
Chris Ballestra, manager of city development, said Nurse was correct but that the city is not in the restaurant building business. Bollestra said it is best to provide business owners the opportunity to come in and make the space their own.
In February, the city is scheduled to issue a “request for proposal” for the restaurant spaces.
The city has “had people knocking on the door for months wanting to be in those spaces and build in those spaces,” Ballestra said. “It allows the restaurant community to come to us and say ‘Here’s what I would like to do.’ ”
Newton called the design a “pipe dream.” He said the public was sold one design, with the inclusion of an underwater garden, and now those amenities are not happening. “The garden is gone, (but) the price is still the same,” Newton said.
Council members Bill Dudley and Charlie Gerdes said the design was slated to change all along. The council, they said, voted on a concept and knew that the design would change during the process of its development with public feedback.
In the past few months thousands of people have seen presentations about the Lens given by Lisa Wannemacher, local architect and member of the Maltzan team.
From those meetings, suggestions and concerns were addressed and changes to the design were made.
For example, Wannemacher said before public input, there was no specific space on the “Lens” for fishing and no restaurant spaces and now there is.
“I really have a genuine appreciation for the fact that you did listen,” Dudley said of public suggestions. “It is evident by the changes that you (made).”
Pier a Part of the Waterfront Master Plan?
A new petition group, Stop the Lens, has been collecting signatures for a few months in hopes to stop the Maltzan design. One of the key arguments is that the new waterfront master plan needs to be completed before a design is selected a new pier built.
Mayor Bill Foster said the pier and the development of the waterfront master plan are two independent items.
Since the late 1800s, Foster said, St. Petersburg has had a pier and no waterfront master plan. Creating one now, “is not going to change that … we are going to have a pier.”
“We can argue or discuss the waterfront master plan vs. pier,” council member Jeff Danner said. “The reality is, they are both going forward at the same time.”
While he does not agree with the organizers of Stop the Lens, Foster said he welcomes the critics and the concerns of opponents. He said it makes for a better pier, a better St. Petersburg.
“It forces us to address any flaws or deficiencies,” Foster said. “Keep it up.”
What's Next?
What was presented Tuesday was the "basis of design," which will be voted on Thursday by City Council.
"The real heavy lifting comes after this," Ballestra said. "This is really just the beginning of the design."
The Council will vote Thursday on whether to accept the "basis of design" report.
If approved, the report will allow "the Maltzan team to proceed with the design of the new St. Petersburg Pier and Skanska USA Builders to continue providing pre-construction phase services and geotechnical services."
The basis of design report is designed to shore up costs of the design. If approved, the next phase is the schematic design phase. That, according to city documents, "will provide a comprehensive design and preparation of construction documents for use by Skanska in providing a guaranteed maximum price and constructing the new St. Petersburg Pier."
Proposed Pier Timeline
- May 31, 2013: St. Petersburg Pier Closes
- Fall 2013: St. Petersburg Pier Demolished
- Winter 2014: Construction on the "Lens" Begins
- Summer 2015: "Lens" Completed
Today, the future of the Lens could be in jeopardy pending a court hearing between the city of St. Petersburg and VoteOnthePier.com petitioners. Representing the 16,000-plus petitioners is former mayoral candidate Kathleen Ford.
Stay with Patch for updates about today's court hearing.
WILLIS GARFUNKLE
9:59 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012
AMATUER DESIGN. LAME CONCEPT. CUMBERSOME ACCESS.
AN UNMITAGATED FAILURE IN THE MAKING.
Dharma
9:59 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012
does anyone reading this want this ?? i do not mean your resigned to it, do you want it here?
Rider
11:05 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012
Hubris....comparing the Lens with the Eiffel Tower......or one could say humorous!....what is so amazing about the canopy at the end of a few looping walkways? Give me a total break!
Shore Acres Rick
11:05 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012
I like it more now than I did when it was first selected. And while it's artistic design has grown on me, especially in comparison to the current structure, but it's still not as functional as it could or should be. If this project fails, it will because the city and the architects did not take the very legitimate criticisms seriously for quite a long time.
nic weathersbee
11:06 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012
"For example, Wannemacher said before public input, there was no specific space on the “Lens” for fishing and no restaurant spaces and now there is."
This is a very interesting comment as it illustrates the complete lack of understanding of our city, our state, and the people who live in Florida...or piers for that matter. No specific place for fishing? Out of touch. This exemplifies how much this is an art sculpture to them, and not a pier. You don't fish and get scales on an art sculpture.
And now we have "designated" areas for fishing? And where will those be? Why can't one fish off the entire design as we can now? And how good will fishing be when a majority of the 90 year old ecosystem will be gone? There are so many questions...will the invasive green mussel take over on the new pilings? This has been mentioned by the marine scientists I believe, due to the fact that the green mussels propagate so much more quickly than the native species.
Restaurant space that any developer will know will have to be evacuated when they sound the lens alarm. When they DO sound the alarm, where exactly will people evacuate to escape the sideways rain and lightning. If you think about it, when they sound the alarm, they will have to go to some kind of shelter...where exactly is that on this proposed shrinking design. The Shrinky Dink Lens. I wonder if lightning will be attracted to an aluminum covered steel tiara? There's more where this came from, lol.
D.H.L
11:57 am on Wednesday, December 5, 2012
I am a dreamer .we need place to fishing ,a Hotel on the water and stores with restaurants , a gymnasium and galery or museum.A big but very big aquarium.
If you will do please do right .
michele sangillo
10:51 pm on Wednesday, December 5, 2012
I totally agree, I see no economic benefit to the city with this design. Just people running, riding bikes and walking. We can do that throughout the city and downtown.
Edith
4:47 pm on Wednesday, December 5, 2012
According to this article, "Foster said he welcomes the critics and the concerns of the opponents." What a joke! He listens like the rest of the Committee. It's difficult to believe that this is a committee of people who is supposed to be representing the residents of St. Petersburg. So far, over 16,000 people have already objected to this plan by signing a petetion against it, and, yet, this Committee, other than Wengay Newton, still thought that its members knew better than the rest of us. Why put the decision on the ballot when all of the brilliant people on the Committee knew what was best for everyone? Kathleen, I wish you the greatest success in that court hearing. At least you will be appearing before people who will ACTUALLY be listening.
Adam Kolojay
4:47 pm on Wednesday, December 5, 2012
The people need to vote. If the council does not allow us to vote then we should vote everyone including the mayor out of office. Fosters Folly! Whoever runs against him in a couple of years with a platform to redo the pier. Hopefully we can stall the construction of the Lens until the Mayor and all council members supporting this disaster can be removed. Has anyone mentioned how hot this structure will be in the summer? Concrete painted white will make it about 110 degrees. No one will use it!
SandyFishGirl
9:26 pm on Thursday, December 6, 2012
Maltzan said that like the Eiffel Tower in Paris, the Lens will provide a "literal" view of the city but will also enable the public to envision what St. Petersburg may be like in the future.
WHERE did this guy come from? I pray, this is NOT what our city will look like in the future. Yuck!
SandyFishGirl
9:26 pm on Thursday, December 6, 2012
Lisa Wannemacher, local architect and member of the Maltzan team.
Is the same group that has done other designs for the City? Including the unfinished mess of a skate park near Walter Fuller. It doesn't appear to me that this group will be getting out of this project. Foster says, Keep it up", maybe we can convince him that the design fits in Space Mountain's neighborhood but NOT downtown St. Pete!! GO BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD!!!
MirrorLakeMan
1:16 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013
Those illustrations are a hopeful farce at best. People are not going to just hang around the walkways of The Pier. Sure kayaking looks like fun, but the interior waterspace isn't big enough nor with enough spaces to explore. The mere fact that the Architects, in all this time, never figured out that:
-it gets hot in St. Petersburg and people need shade
-people and cars like the idea of driving out to the end and turning around ; just for fun; as opposed to walking out there
-you're going to need several restaurants out there; not just one big Disney-esque cafeteria. People have differents tastes. The fact that no one thought of this in the first place scares me.
-You need something as dramatic as the London Eye! or the Rio de Janeiro Waterfall
-You need something that will attract people out to the Pier even in bad weather. The Pier currently has bad weather attractions; stores, restaurants, an old aquarium
- You will need way more Air conditioning shelter than what is currently proposed.
- Having a view from the 5th floor makes the Pier exciting. Having several elevators makes a lot of sense currently. Lowering the view to 2 stories losing the view. And not being able to protect the people from the elements is just plain silly.
All in all...this design has not been well thought out; and seems too intent on just pushing the deal through -- as a notch in the belt -- without caring about what the people really want.