Cops, Red Lights and Speeding

Is there really a higher standard for police officers or just a more convenient one?

John Romano has a great piece in the Tampa Bay Times about how police officer red-light violations are being mishandled. It is a follow up to an article by Michael Van Sickler.

Romano raises the age old question are the cops above the law? The question might be more accurately stated; do the people who run law enforcement think they and the people they manage are above the law?

The real answer is: It depends. When it serves them to use the law they will use it and when it serves them to not follow the law they will use that also. Management at the St. Pete PD will tell you they are a paramilitary organization. They follow command protocol. The rules are the law and they follow the rules.

My five years at the St. Pete PD lead me to conclude they are a conveniently paramilitary organization. When it is convenient they follow a paramilitary command structure and when it is not convenient, they don't.

Chief Harmon indicates they discipline officers running red lights but don't require them to pay the fine. Indications are there are no historical reports or records kept of these infractions or discipline.

Recently, I made a public records request for information regarding officers speeding. See my Post, As questions arise, about police officers & speeding, inquiry reveals no formal tracking system in place, for  a conveniently paramilitary response.

The point is either there is no recurring report or they want to make it as difficult to get as possible.

In an organization that tracks everything right down to flashlights and batteries, it seems a bit difficult to believe you would not track the driving performance of 500 plus officers who ply the City streets for 4 million miles per year. The tools are there. The red-light camera photos and footage, the GPS system with speed data is in every Police cruiser.

How can you manage something you don't track? Maybe City Council should make these statistics part of the monthly PD Performance Measures Report.

Using discipline as opposed to paying the fine is a paramilitary cop out. A police officer will remember paying the fine long after he/she has forgotten the discipline.

Most people who have paid the $158 would probably be happy to come down to the station and have someone tell them to just do better and be careful to avoid paying the fine. But we don't have that option. 

Police Chief Chuck Harmon is fond of saying we hold officers to a higher standard. I don't think there is a higher standard that paying what you owe when you break the law.

e-mail doc at: dr.webb@verizon.net

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Red May 27, 2012 at 01:36 PM
Watch out Doc! There you go making good sense again. Have not gotten a ticket lately but that brisk "talking to" instead of the cash fine sounds pretty good.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »