Budget Summit: Public Supports Tax Increase, Opposes Cuts

An overwhelming majority of the public that spoke at Wednesday night's budget summit spoke in favor of increasing revenues to balance the city's budget instead of relying on budget cuts.

Mayor Bill Foster and members of City Council came into Wednesday night's budget summit at the J.W. Cate Center wanting input from the public on how it wants to combat a $13 million budget shortfall for 2013.

After nearly two hours and 32 speakers, the public overwhelmingly said it did not want the budget to be balanced on the backs of service cuts this year, but instead favored  and increased millage rates. 

Only one speaker of the 32 was opposed to any type of property tax increase.

Most said it was time for everyone to pay a higher share to ensure quality of life is not negatively affected in St. Pete. 

Brett Page, a St. Pete resident, said he once paid $4,400 in local property taxes in St. Pete. Now, however, he pays $2,200 less. 

"I’m more than willing to pay what’s necessary to keep the city running," Page said. "You should set your needs in your budget and (then) set your revenues to met those needs."

For council member Jim Kennedy, the chair of the Budget, Finance and Taxation Committee, it was what he was hoping to hear. 

"What I’ve heard, and something that I've been advocating, is that it's OK to look for more revenue sources. That people are willing to pay to keep this standard" of living, Kennedy said.

"Thank you for telling us it is OK to raise more revenue (to) keep our standard of living." 

St. Pete resident Georgia Johnson said youth programs and crime prevention are important. Raising the millage, she said, allows for those types of services to continue. "Prevention rather than incarceration," she said.

"I understand that we already passed a law giving the city (the authority) to collect up to 10 mils," Johnson said. 

Now that the public has said it would support higher taxes, Kennedy said he wants to know how much of an increase they would support. Kennedy has said that he favors a fire readiness fee in place of a millage increase,

Another revenue generator the council has discussed is a street light assessment fee.

Foster said that there still will be cuts but it must be met with a millage increase. 

"I do recommend that we find $10 million in additional revenue," Foster said at last week's budget workshop. He also said the city could come up with $3 million in reductions packages, which would be specified later, but that is as much as he would recommend.

In a political climate where increasing taxes is considered out of the question, council member Karl Nurse said he appreciates the public recognizing the need to increase revenue.

He said with declining property values, the public is actually paying less than in pervious years. Increasing taxes would allow the city to bring in the same amount of revenue it had last year, he said.

"(I'm) glad that people want to take a U-turn," Nurse said. "Cutting economic development and cutting work in neighborhoods, the result (has been) obvious, high unemployment and neighborhoods are bad."   

Council member Bill Dudley said that while he is a conservative at heart, "I heard you loud and clear." He likened getting to the point of increasing property taxes to cutting the fat off of a steak. "We are now close to the meat," he said. "We have cut about all we can cut."

Foster said he was pleased with the turnout – a standing-room only crowd of around 100 people. In previous years, city staff outnumbered the public attendees. 

"This was our opportunity to hear your vision for this city as we look forward," Foster said Wednesday night. 

A group that made its presence felt at the meeting was the . The group has been collecting surveys since March on what the public values in the city budget. 

On Wednesday, the group released preliminary results from 2,000-plus surveys. 

  • 2,011 surveys have been taken.
  • Vast majority of respondents live north of Central Avenue.
  • 71 percent of respondents are opposed to further cuts in service.
  • More than two-thirds of respondents would support some type of revenue/millage increase.

To take the survey, you can visit peoplesbudgetreview.org.

"I appreciate your...  acceptance of this initiative," said Christian Haas of the People's Budget Review to the attendees. "It gives me hope in the direction of the city. I’m convinced that citizens of St. Pete can comprehend and participate in the budget process on the local level."

Bill Bucolo April 26, 2012 at 05:07 PM
@Dick. WRONG Dick. I agree we need better efficiency with city assets, but the public is overwhelmingly in favor of increasing millage rates to property owners. The most these increases would amount to is $50 or less per year for middle and upper middle class homes in exchange for keeping amenities like parks, after school programs, clean roadsides-- not to mention police, fire and libraries, fully funded.
William Mansell April 26, 2012 at 05:29 PM
For those who support a millage increase, how much would you want it to increase? For those opposed to an increase, what would you cut out of the city's budget?
richard boggs April 27, 2012 at 12:05 AM
I greatly support property tax increases! I think the county, city and state needs to agressively seek out those who owe back taxes. Recoup those taxes at any and all means!! St. Petersburg (Florida in general) has a very large rental population. Create a larger tax for those who own rental properties and maybe create a direct rental tax..this would mean those who rent would be contributing something to the city which they are of benefit!
Jack Sprat June 14, 2012 at 04:23 PM
Those who suggest increasing taxes should look to a much simpler solution: a city sales tax. Then everyone participates in funding all these wants and needs. Putting everything from buses to rec centers onto property tax payers is simply shifting and concentrating the burden and responsibility on those we depend on for basic services like protection and education. Increased property taxes and insurance cause a decrease in property values and an increase in foreclosures. Has anyone noticed the population growth in St. Petersburg? NO? That's because there isn't any. Property values have declined and foreclosures have increased and who is hiring? We don't have a lack of tax revenues, we have a spending problem. I would like to know how many of the 2.5% of voters participating in this people's budget con game are actually paying property taxes. No one seems to be willing to answer that question. Even if it is 100%, that is still only 2.5% of voters. Nothing proven here other than a few people can make a lot of noise.
Jack Sprat June 14, 2012 at 04:31 PM
A sales tax on everyone would raise more money more quickly. Raising taxes on rental properties would simply result in increased rental costs. Why not spread the responsibility to everyone with a sales tax?


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »