.

Fire Readiness Fee Up for Approval Thursday

City Council will consider a fire readiness fee Thursday that is projected to generate around $10 million for the city next year, which would cover most of the city's projected budget shortfall.

On Thursday, the proposed fire readiness fee will be up for a vote from the City Council during a public hearing on the issue. 

The per parcel fee would generate around $10 million next year, which could nearly cover all of the city's projected fiscal year 2013 budget shortfall. 

The yearly tax is set up into two tiers as a 75/25. With the fee, 75 percent of the revenues would come from a per parcel fee. With 105,000 taxable parcels in the city, said that means each parcel would pay $75 a year. The other quarter of the revenues to be generated with the fee will be relative per household improvement value.

Mayor Bill Foster and the Council have been more willing to implement the fee rather than hiking property taxes with a millage increase. 

"It’s a tax, (but) now where it’s different and where I am comfortable recommending this; it's a fee on everybody," Mayor Bill Foster said at a June Council meeting. "To where every single person receiving the benefits of libraries, police, fire, parks, pools ... everyone receiving these benefits will pay something. Even if it's $5 a month, at least they are paying something."

According to the Tampa Bay Times, Foster plans to use the readiness fee, along with budget cuts, to balance next year's budget. The fee, Foster said, helps stop cuts to services. 

"The proposal, Foster said, represents the sixth year of declining property values. Revenues from property taxes in 2013 will decline by more than $1 million from 2012. Since 2008, those revenues have declined more than $35 million, Foster said."

Funds the city collects from the fire readiness, also called assessment, fee would be legally bound to paying for fire services. Those funds could not be moved to the general fund, capital projects or operating expenses. 

The proposed fee acts like a flat fee for all parcels, regardless of property value, in St. Petersburg and includes non-profits and churches, which do not pay property taxes. 

According to city documents, the proposed ordinance does have "hardship" provisions for individuals unable to pay the fee. 

“(The City) may grant a hardship deferment, in which case the tax parcel in question will receive a deferral. The owner shall be required to execute a binding agreement encumbering the tax parcel and otherwise assure the city that payment in full of the assessment and any recording cost, plus interest at an estimate cost of city fund compounded annually, shall be due over a period of time or upon sale or transfer of the property … the City Council may determine to release such deferments in the future. However, all funding for such hardship deferment, or the consequences of the deferment or any future release, shall be from legally available funds other than direct proceeds of the assessments.”

Other Council Items Thursday

The Council will consider a new business item brought by Council Member Karl Nurse, which will look at the city's ordinance regulating urban farming. Nurse is asking for the item to be considered by the Public Services and Infrastructure Committee. 

“When St. Petersburg passed the county’s first community gardening ordinance, we did not consider that there might be an interest within a few years in creating gardens that would grow a sufficient crop to sell,” Nurse writes. “Now, a number of organizations are considering establishing small urban farms as is done in a number of other cities including Tampa. These farms create jobs for young people in inner city neighborhoods and encourage healthy foods.”

Jack Sprat July 11, 2012 at 05:03 PM
"Funds the city collects from the fire readiness, also called assessment, fee would be legally bound to paying for fire services. Those funds could not be moved to the general fund, capital projects or operating expenses." What they don't say is that the fee will lessen the amount of funding from property taxes and/or the general fund. In other words, it is still a tax and the city still has a spending problem and taxpayers are still paying for their incompetence. And our own City Councilman Jeff Danner, PSTA Chairman of the Board, is trying to push a new sales tax on everyone in the entire county to pay for a $2 BILLION train that will be totally paid for by taxpayers. This is a $10 million tax for fire protection - which sounds pretty good. How about a $2 BILLION tax for a train? How does that sound? How many people really want to ride a train to Clearwater? How much are you willing to pay for a ticket? We have a spending problem and we have NO control over those who spend our money. Because only THEY know what is best for US.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something