Fire Tax Struck Down While Property Tax Hike, Budget Approved

On Thursday night, city council voted to not go forward with the controversial fire readiness fee. Instead, council approved a millage increase.

The fire tax, or so-called fire readiness fee, will not be part of St. Pete's fiscal year 2013 budget. On Thursday night, city council voted 6-2 to strike down the fire tax that would have generated nearly $10 million in annual revenue for the city. 

Instead, council shifted its focus to balancing the budget by increasing the millage rate. What that millage rate will eventually be and what the budget is, is still up in the air despite a 7-1 vote by council Thursday to adopt a 6.7742 millage rate. 

"I anticipate that coming down," said Mayor Bill Foster of the millage rate for his $472 million 2013 budget.  

In order to move discussions along — the council met for nearly five hours on the budget Thursday night — councilors approved the tentative rate and budget in order to fine-tune the millage and budget by the Sept. 27 budget hearing. The city will be required to adopt its budget that night because the fiscal year begins Oct. 1.

The millage rate approved Thursday, which is about 12 percent over the rollback rate, is considered a placeholder until it can recalculated for the budget. Foster and his staff were proposing a fire tax along with a millage increase that would go back to the rollback rate. That means, because of a decrease in property values, that an increase in the property tax rate would generate the same amount of revenues in 2013 as 2012. 

 collected slightly more than the city needed to close its nearly $10 million budget shortfall. 

Since the fire tax is out of the equation, Foster will be proposing a millage rate at the Sept. 27 meeting that would cover the budget shortfall with no extras. 

While he voted for the budget and millage increase Thursday, council member Jeff Danner said that if the budget doesn't have a real plan going forward on how to improve the city that he will not approve it on Sept. 27. 

"I don’t see the plan to move forward," he said. "Unless I’m convinced that there is a plan behind the budget to do something about 5,400 vacant homes, the neighborhood partnership department, to help the small businesses, to fix things," Danner said he is going to vote no on the budget next time.  

Council member Jim Kennedy was the 'no' vote on the millage increase and later on the budget because it did not include the fire readiness fee. 

"I just think doing it all on millage rate is a mistake," Kennedy said. He said that a high millage rate could hurt an already fragile real estate market and could scare away businesses from moving to St. Pete. 

The fire readiness fee, he said, would be a better way to diversify the city's revenue streams while raising money and not scaring off businesses. 

Despite getting no other support from council, council member Wengay Newton continued to call for the city to draw down some of its reserves to plug holes in the budget for next year. 

"I do not believe we should hoarding money like banks," he said. 

Council member Karl Nurse echoed Danner and council chair Leslie Curran's sentiments about having a budget plan moving forward and the struggles in building a better city. 

"The challenge is how do you keep downward pressure on spending at the same time try to investment so that you grow your city’s economy," Nurse said. "Think about the places you want to live in your life and where you want to go. It wasn’t the places with the lowest taxes. It was the nicest place you could live. And our challenge (is) ... how can we make this the nicest city."

Concerned Floridian September 14, 2012 at 11:17 AM
It's not the first time that Jim Kennedy shows his regressive stand favoring the 1% to the detriment of the 99%. The article above omitted to identify the other council member who was in opposition to striking down the regressive tax?
Red September 14, 2012 at 11:55 AM
While no one "likes" a tax increase. I believe we do see the need from time to time . At least we will be calling it what it is. Costs go up after all, it's the way of the world.
William Mansell September 14, 2012 at 01:36 PM
Council member Bill Dudley also voted for the fire fee.
Concerned Floridian September 14, 2012 at 01:59 PM
Thanks for letting us know about Bill Dudley - my crystal ball was auguring as such. Quite ironic: this man, B. Dudley, before becoming an incumbent, campaigned opposing the way city hall, the mayor and their administrations were conducting their business. He campaigned on a ferocious rhetoric of changing all that! Once elected, Mr. Dudley changed his mind 180 degrees, and became [with Jim Kennedy (who was not elected at first but 'chosen' by the city council)] one of the most loyal 'rubber stamping' council persons out there. In line with this fact, I often observed him sleeping while attending city council meetings; it may be why he needs to rely on city administration reports as he does not have a clue himself of what's going on - so he chooses to go with the flow... Pitiful.
Bill H. September 14, 2012 at 04:05 PM
Why does it still say there is 10 million shortfall? That was from early predictions of the fall in real estate values, but the tax office said the drop would not be nearly that bad.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »